How Low Commission Life Insurance Products Maximize Returns
Rajiv Rebello
Author
August 28, 2017
By now we all now the problems with permanent life insurance: low returns and high premium costs.
However, these poor returns are largely due to the large commissions paid to agents who sell these policies. In our previous post (see here) we discussed how most life insurance products impose high surrender charges on policy owners if they cancel the policy. They do this in an attempt to recoup the high costs associated with paying the life insurance agent 80% to 100% of the first-year premium. The policy owner ends up paying the price for the agent’s compensation when they cancel the policy and get very little back.
With low commission products on the other hand, the carrier is not obligated to pay the agent such a large amount upfront. As a result, they can afford to reduce/eliminate surrender charges and offer policy owners significantly higher cash accumulation and surrender values. Doing this significantly increases the return on the product as illustrated in the table and chart below.
In our next post we’ll show you how to properly fund the low commission life insurance product to maximize returns.
By reducing upfront commissions and increasing back-end ones, the low commission product is able to better align incentives between agents and policy owners. With the high commission product, the agent gets paid a high upfront commission in year one that he gets to keep even if the policy owner cancels the policy in subsequent years. In order to recoup their expenses upon cancellation, the life insurance company then has to assess high surrender charges that result in minimal cash surrender values being offered to the policy owner if they cancel the product.
With the low commission product, the agent is incentivized by back-end commissions to sell the product to policy owners who will keep the product for the long-term. And since the upfront commission is low, the life insurance company doesn’t have to charge excessive surrender charges if the policy owner cancels. As a result, the policy owner gets a product with higher cash value accumulation in the product. At the end of 10 years this amounts to a $25,926 gain in cash surrender value for a policy owner who purchases a low commission product as opposed to a high commission one.
Both products pay $9,000/year into their respective policies. However, the high commission product has to assess high surrender charges in order to recoup the high commissions they paid in the first year to the agent. As a result, the cash surrender values are significantly lower than that of the low commission product. At the end of 10 years, a policy owner who purchases a high commission product over a low commission one will lose $25,926 in cash surrender value.
Rajiv Rebello
Author
Rajiv Rebello, FSA, CERA is the Principal and Chief Actuary of Colva Insurance Services. Colva helps family offices, RIAs, and high net worth individuals create better after-tax and risk-adjusted portfolio solutions through the use of life insurance vehicles and low-correlation alternative assets. He can be reached at [email protected].
As we’ll show in this article, borrowing against your stock portfolio is a lot quicker, more tax-efficient, and has significantly less closing costs than getting a traditional loan from your bank. Anyone who has purchased a home is familiar with the concept of...
By placing tax-inefficient investments within a tax-free wrapper like PPLI and taking their money out via tax-free loans, UHNW clients can improve after-tax returns by nearly 300 basis points or more over the long-term compared to investing those assets within a...
The traditional asset allocation glidepath involves shifting client assets away from stocks towards bonds as they near retirement. The idea behind this is that doing so reduces volatility in the portfolio and helps protect against sequence of return risk—thereby...
0 Comments